Skip to content
ElderCareCosts
SOURCE DATA AUG 2026

Nursing Homes · Medicare certified

Bonita Hills Post Acute

1233 West La Habra Boulevard · La Habra, CA 90631 · 86 certified beds

5626910781

License number not yet on file. We only publish license numbers we can source from an official registry.

Are you the operator? Claim this profile. Corrections are free, always.

About Bonita Hills Post Acute

Bonita Hills Post Acute is a nursing home in La Habra, California, in Orange County. Public records list 86 beds. It is Medicare certified. Ownership records list a for-profit operator and tie the listing to David Johnson. We hold 90 inspection citations for this listing, the most recent dated 28 January 2026. Public enforcement records list no fine or payment denial against it. Reported staffing works out to 4.28 nurse hours per resident per day. Every fact above comes from the public records listed in the sources section on this page. The newest source file we hold for this listing is dated August 2026.

Public record

CMS Care Compare · Source data August 2026

Certification

  • Medicare-certified (CMS Certification Number on file)

Ratings

3.0(CMS Care Compare)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2026-08-01.GOV

Staffing rating

3.0

Quality-measure rating

5.0

Inspections on record

2

Cited deficiencies

67

3.0(CMS Care Compare)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2026-07-01.GOV

Staffing rating

3.0

Quality-measure rating

5.0

Inspections on record

2

Cited deficiencies

67

Not yet ratedSource: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2026Q1.GOV

Staffing rating

Not published

Quality-measure rating

Not published

Inspections on record

Not published

Cited deficiencies

Not published

Not yet ratedSource: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2025Q4.GOV

Staffing rating

Not published

Quality-measure rating

Not published

Inspections on record

Not published

Cited deficiencies

Not published

3.0(CMS Care Compare)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2026-06-01.GOV

Staffing rating

3.0

Quality-measure rating

5.0

Inspections on record

2

Cited deficiencies

67

Inspection history (90)

Records from January 2022 to January 2026.

  • January 14, 2022 · E

    Citation F0761

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0761 (CMS scope/severity E: pattern, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0689

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0689 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0756

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0756 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0688

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0688 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0813

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0813 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0908

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0908 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Keep all essential equipment working safely. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0558

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0558 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0802

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0802 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0921

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0921 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

  • January 14, 2022 · D

    Citation F0604

    Federal surveyors cited this nursing home on 2022-01-14 under CMS tag F0604 (CMS scope/severity D: isolated, no actual harm, potential for more than minimal harm) for Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment. The deficiency was recorded as corrected on 2022-02-14. Source: CMS Care Compare Health Deficiencies (as of 2026-06-01).

    View original record (opens in a new tab)Source: CMS Care Compare · Updated 2022-01-14.GOV

Penalties

Total fines on file: $0

Staffing

Latest: 4.28 nurse staffing hours per resident per day (2026Q1)

Staffing trend (5 periods)

  1. 2025Q44.34 hrs/resident/day
  2. 2026-06-014.34 hrs/resident/day
  3. 2026-07-014.28 hrs/resident/day
  4. 2026-08-014.28 hrs/resident/day
  5. 2026Q14.28 hrs/resident/day

Most recent period is lower than 2025Q4 (-0.06 hrs/resident/day). Figures are CMS-reported nurse staffing hours, not our estimate.

Ownership

For profit - Limited Liability company

CMS Care Compare chain: David Johnson

Chain ID 851 · 48 facilities in chain (CMS)

  • Chain average overall rating: 3.2
  • Chain average health inspection rating: 2.7
  • Chain average staffing rating: 3.3
  • Chain average quality measure rating: 4.3

Chain averages are CMS-published figures for facilities sharing this Chain ID (formerly Affiliated Entity). They are not ElderCareCosts scores.

A separate ownership filing names a different organization for this listing. We are not publishing that name while the two government records disagree.

Recent changes to this listing

Watch this facility: new record changes publish to an RSS feed any feed reader can follow. No signup.

Each line is a difference between two readings of a government file. It says what the source reported, not what the provider did.

  1. Sep 1, 2026Ownership changed

    The source now records ownership as "For profit - Limited Liability company".

    Reported by CMS nursing homes (provider info)

  2. Aug 6, 2026Ownership changed

    The source now records ownership as "For profit".

    Reported by CMS nursing homes (ownership)

  3. Jul 24, 2026Ownership changed

    The source now records ownership as "For profit - Limited Liability company".

    Reported by CMS nursing homes (provider info)

  4. Jul 24, 2026Ownership changed

    The source now records ownership as "For profit".

    Reported by CMS nursing homes (ownership)

  5. Jul 23, 2026First appeared in our data

    This listing first appeared in the government file we read. That is usually when it entered the file, not the day it opened.

    Reported by CMS nursing homes (provider info)

Ratings, inspections, and penalties are public records, reproduced in plain English without edits to their substance. View source records · What these measures mean.

Typical cost

Genworth CareScout Cost of Care Survey · 2025

This provider doesn't publish a specific price to us. Below is the typical CA range for the care type(s) it offers. Use it as context, not a quote.

Nursing Homes

Median · CA$12,167/mo
See full CA cost breakdownSource: Genworth CareScout Cost of Care Survey · Updated 2025

Nearby alternatives

Other licensed providers in La Habra, with their own public records.

Compare side by side

A comparison puts both public records in one view and marks any measure the two are not held to alike, so a blank never reads as a bad score.

Deciding between options? Nursing Homes Guide: Skilled Nursing & Long-Term Care

Check availability and pricing at Bonita Hills Post Acute

Request info and we'll pass it directly to Bonita Hills Post Acute, or call them at 5626910781 if you'd rather talk now.

Request info

Trust & methodology

Where this information came from

Each block below is one file we read, the date on that file, and the fields on this page that came from it. The date is when the source published or we retrieved it, not the day we last looked at this listing.

CMS nursing homes (provider info)as of August 2026
Chain identifier, Chain name, City, CMS Special Focus status, County, Licensed capacity, Map location, Medicare certification number, Name, Ownership type, Phone number, State, Street address, ZIP code
CMS nursing homes (ownership)as of July 2026
Parent organization
CMS nursing homes (payroll-based journal staffing)as of June 2026
Staffing hours per resident day

Read how we handle every file on the data sources page.